Scott Talks About...

"No one writes better mystery suspense novels than Scott Turow." — Los Angeles Times
Limitations
A novel by Scott Turow

Ordinary Heroes

Visit Bookwrap Central's Podcast page for an audio or video podcast of Scott Turow discussing his book Ordinary Heroes.

The Craft of Writing

Once I got that computer I did not write in a linear fashion anymore.

I think that my career as a writer owes a lot to the fact that the computer can organize all of it. You just move those blocks of text around. I couldn't imagine writing that way when I was younger. I used to read about Nabokov who would write paragraphs out on index cards all over his books, and I thought, 'How can the guy do that? You've got to have it all in order in your head.' But I'll be damned. That's now the way I write.
 

Scott explains the initial impulse that led him to write Presumed Innocent and why he sets his novels in the fictional Kindle County.
I seldom write from beginning to end. I'm about to begin this stage on a new book. What I will do is just write down scenes. A lawyer told me a story about a coroner's inquest and I sketched out the scene. Someday I'm going to figure out where that scene fits in the book.

I didn't want to get stuck with having a geography I couldn't alter. I find novels set in real places, involving fictionalized historical events, to be hokey. I'd rather make the fictional cut at the first level and just say this is a nonexistent place, these are nonexistent people. Now, we're all gonna sit around and agree it's real.

I don't have a lot of fixed rules. But I definitely do not have an outline until the later stages. Usually the outline is for the second or third draft.

One of the things I wanted to do was sort of kick back and write in what I took to be my own voice, and the thing that made me feel that I could do it was meeting the chief deputy prosecutor in Boston, who was not only a gifted trial lawyer. but also a poet.

Mystery Novels

One of the ironies is that this poor genre, the mystery, is so looked down upon, yet it enthralls people. It delivers answers that life and certainly the courtroom cannot.

If the defendant says, "I'm not guilty," and goes on maintaining that until the very end, you try your case, the jury finds the facts, but all they're doing is making educated guesses in a criminal case. You know beyond a reasonable doubt, but you don't know beyond any doubt at all that that's what really occurred.

Only in the mystery novel are we delivered final and unquestionable solutions. The joke to me is that fiction gives you a truth that reality can't deliver.

Influences

Scott Turow finds inspiration in the novels of Saul Bellow and Charles Dickens, calling Bellow "a gargantuan influence," Dickens "a profound influence."
I think Dickens is a profound influence on me. But as a younger person I didn't necessarily appreciate Dickens.

The most enthralling American writer to me when I was much younger was Saul Bellow. He's from Chicago as I am. he has a good sense of the vernacular. He's interested in ideas.

I don't think building suspense is terribly mysterious. The fact is that its [methods] are eternal and always work... Chekov said if there's a gun hanging on the wall in Act 1, it better go off in Act 3. That's an important principle — that you have to lay the groundwork for any dramatic developments. You have to hang the gun on the wall, and you have to do it in a way that is not terribly obtrusive.
Charles Dickens:
It's a view of the novel as being governed principally by plot and bringing out the characters within the conditions that the plot proves. It's like building on the land between the streets. You'd look at Dickens and say that he's a novelist who created robust characters without giving up his principal mission as a storyteller. So I have always recognized a large Dickensian influence in my writing. Did I read a ton of Dickens? Yes, absolutely, as a child. Did I read it with particular relish or appreciation? No.
Saul Bellow:
He was a gargantuan influence. But an influence also in the sense that over time I began to identify my points of disagreement with him as a writer as well as the vast areas where I admire him. So he became influential in both senses.